WebThe Cathode Ray Tube (CRT) Indirect class action alleges that Chunghwa, LG, Philips, Panasonic, Hitachi, Toshiba, Samsung and Thomson (the “Defendants”) fixed the prices of CRT from March 1, 1995 through November 25, 2007, which resulted in overcharges to individuals and businesses that bought CRT Products. In a class action lawsuit, one or ... WebCRT Price Fixing Lawsuits by direct and indirect purchasers were filed in various federal courts alleging that various technology companies conspired between the mid-1990s and mid-2000s to fix the price of CRTs, making televisions, computer monitors and similar products much more expensive than they otherwise would have been.

CRT Indirect Purchaser Class Action Settlement

WebSee In re Cathode Ray Tube (CRT) Antitrust Litig., 536 F. Supp. 2d 1364 (J.P.M.L. 2008). On March 11, 2024, the Court granted preliminary approval of amended settlement agreements between six groups of corporate defendants1 and several Statewide Damages Classes of indirect purchasers of CRT products (“22 Indirect Purchaser State Classes”). WebCATHODE RAY TUBE INDIRECT PURCHASER ANTITRUST CLASS ACTION - MITSUBISHI SETTLEMENT Case History Several class actions were filed in 2007 alleging that the Defendants conspired to raise and fix the prices of CRT Products, which resulted in overcharges to consumers who purchased CRT Products. These class actions burned linseed oil

NOT FOR PUBLICATION - Supreme Court of the United States

Web2000 PGA Blvd. Ste 4440, PMB 148 Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33408 WebThus, claims based on indirect purchases of CRT Products made in all other states, including the Other Repealer States and the Non-Repealer States, are no longer being released. (c) The attorneys’ fee award to be requested by IPP Counsel is reduced by $29,000,000 in order to offset the reduction in the settlement amounts, and ensure there … WebGilmore v. Monsanto Co. c/o Postlethwaite & Netterville. PO Box 4208. Baton Rouge, LA 70821. burned lip from hot food